A Stand Alone Comment

I am sure you can relate to my experiences of being drawn into dynamic posts and discussions. It is great to be able to share these posts but often just "liking" a comment doesn't feel enough. A few times in the past I shared comments off the post: From one bee to another.... A stand alone comment. and Deb 🐝 Helfrich's A stand alone comment.

When I read Harvey Lloyds comment on one of my posts, I knew I had to share this one as well. Here is what Harvey writes:

Purpose, motive, agenda and why are all words that engage our senses. If we take these words away then what we sense becomes merely information. Much like an encyclopedia setting on a a shelf. The value of sensory information is directly correlated with the purpose. Whether the purpose is learning, engaging or just plain ole fun the senses constantly compare the environment to the purpose.
When we look at nature we see that every process has a purpose. The amazing aspect of nature is where we find a species process that connects to another and the chain of processes that make up our Eco-System.
We can look at our senses in a vacuum and discuss the process, but our narrative, past, present or future, is a collection of senses input into a purpose. Most important is the human need to compare purpose with each others narrative. If we compare purpose then we can make sense of our connections and differences. If we only compare sensory data then we can find ourselves at odds with others.
on a side note....The scary part for me with AI is this very fact, purpose. Can a few subroutines of code align in such a way that purpose can be altered from the original? The assumption is that the new or altered purpose would build upon some universal belief of goodwill. This is an assumption, without analogue senses, AI will mathematically determine outcomes, or purpose. Harvey Lloyd